The Civil War And Its Ending Of Slavery :: Slavery Essays

The Civil War and Its Ending of SlaveryThis paper is somewhat the civil war and about how it ended break ones backry with theemancipation proclomation. I will also talk abou the physical loses of the war.The South, all overwhelmingly agricultural, produced cash crops such(prenominal) ascotton,tobacco and sugarcane for export to the northeasterly or to Europe, but it depended onthe North for manufactures and for the financial and commercial servicesessential to trade. Slaves were the largest single enthronization in the South, andthe fear of slave unrest ensured the loyalty of nonslaveholders to the economicand cordial system.To maintain peace between the Southern and Northern supporters in the parliamentary and Whig parties, political leaders tried to avoid the slaveryquestion. But with ontogenesis opposition in the North to the extension of slaveryinto the bracing territories, turning away of the wages became increasingly difficult.The minute agree of 1820 temporarily s ettled the issue by establishingthe 36 30 parallel as the line separating free and slave territory in theLouisiana Purchase. Conflict resumed, however, when the United States boundarieswere extended wolfram to the Pacific. The Compromise Measures of 1850 providedfor the admission of California as a free nominate and the organization of two newterritoriesUtah and New Mexicofrom the balance of the visit acquired in theMexican War. The principle of popular sovereignty would be apply there,permitting the territorial legislatures to decide the status of slavery whenthey applied for statehood.Despite the Compromise of 1850, conflict persisted. The South had become aminority section, and its leaders viewed the actions of the U.S. Congress, overwhich they had lost control, with growing concern. The Northeast demanded forits industrial growth a preservative tariff, federal subsidies for shipping andinternal improvements, and a sound banking and currency system. The nor-westlooked to Con gress for free homesteads and federal aid for its roads andwaterways. The South, however, regarded such measures as discriminatory,favoring Northern commercial interests, and it found the rise of antislaveryagitation in the North intolerable. Many free states, for example, passedpersonal liberty laws in an effort to call on the carpet enforcement of the FugitiveSlave Act .The increasing frequency with which "free soilers," politicians who arguedthat no more slave states should be admitted to the Union, won elective officein the North also worried Southerners. The issue of slavery expansion erupted once again in 1854, when Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois pushed throughCongress a bill establishing two new territories -Kansas and Nebraska -andapplying to both the principle of popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act,by voiding the Missouri Compromise, produced a wave of protest in the North,